The use of automated code comparison helps in which of the following scenarios for an IS auditor?

Automated code comparison is particularly effective in determining the correspondence between two program versions. This process involves analyzing two sets of code to identify differences, similarities, and changes made over time. For an IS auditor, this functionality is crucial because it allows for a clear assessment of what modifications have been introduced in newer versions of the software. With this capability, auditors can validate that updates are consistent with design specifications and user requirements, or ensure that critical control measures are retained or enhanced in the latest version.

Using automated tools facilitates quicker and more thorough reviews, reducing the risk of human error that might occur during manual comparison. This aspect is significant in ensuring software integrity and compliance with regulatory or organizational standards, as it allows auditors to track changes meticulously and assure stakeholders that the software's evolution has been properly managed and controlled.