Which action would compromise the independence of a quality assurance team?

The action that would compromise the independence of a quality assurance team is correcting coding errors during the testing process. A quality assurance team is primarily responsible for evaluating and verifying that the software meets specified requirements and is free from defects. Their independence is crucial because it allows them to provide unbiased assessments of the software's quality and the effectiveness of the development process.

When a quality assurance team actively engages in correcting coding errors, they become part of the development process rather than maintaining an objective oversight role. This dual involvement can lead to conflicts of interest, as they may feel pressured to overlook certain issues or make compromises in their evaluations to expedite the development process. Maintaining their independence is essential for the integrity of their assessments and for providing reliable feedback on the quality of the software.

The other actions listed, such as ensuring compliance with development methods, checking test assumptions, and verifying documentation, align with the responsibilities of a quality assurance team and do not compromise their independence. These activities are focused on validation and evaluation rather than intervention in the coding process.